Rethinking the Nature of Life

Rethinking the Nature of Life

Life is more than just the dance of atoms described in our science textbooks. We’re all ephemeral forms of an individuality greater than ourselves, eternal even when we die.

Is there a higher level of being? Or are we merely a collection of atoms — more dust spinning around the center of the galaxy?

James Watson, who discovered the structure of DNA, once said: “You’ve got to be prepared sometimes to do some things that people say you’re not qualified to do,” and “Since you know you’re going to get into trouble, you ought to have someone to save you after you’re in deep s–––. So you better always have someone who believes in you.” For me, that someone was Eliot Stellar, Provost of the University of Pennsylvania, and Chair of the Human Rights Committee of the National Academy of Sciences.

As a student scientist there seemed to be no purpose to the universe. There were no fountains of youth, no lost gardens to explore in far lands. Something was missing, both from my life and from the scientific books in the library. I was also concerned about the failure to use this available know-how to improve the human condition in large parts of the world. This feeling brought me in medical school to compile a book indicating suggestions for necessary changes, thus offering a multifaceted picture of where science stood and where it intended to go. I invited the Secretary General of the UN, the World Health Organization, and Nobel laureates, among others. The response was overwhelming, dispelling any doubt I had about the need for the book.

And that was the problem. I sent the letters from my school mailbox, and the Dean’s office started to receive calls from the U.S. Surgeon General and others trying to locate me. The Dean of Students was convinced the project would fail and upset a lot of important people. But to my mind it wasn’t his concern. I said that in his office when he ordered me to send out letters to the contributors. When I refused, he told me I wouldn’t graduate if I didn’t comply. I told him I already got what I came there for — a medical education, not a piece of paper. When the conversation got heated, he said “I’ve never had a student talk to me like that.” I stood up (and finger pointed) responded “I find it difficult being in the presence of people like you. I’m talking to you as one human being to another.” He told me I’d better find a faculty member to defend me. So I went to Eliot Stellar.

When I refused to obey the Dean, I was summoned before the Student Standards Committee who told me they’d decline recommending me for graduation if I didn’t send out the letters. I was in deep s–––, but Stellar stood behind me. “You shouldn’t be in this alone. They’re bureaucrats — they don’t understand. The new Dean is from the testing agency. He needs to learn that all students aren’t the same.” One night Stellar called me at home. He was putting out the fire, and told me I deserved the MD degree. “The degree isn’t important,” I said “I got the education I came for.” At that point I heard his wife, Betty, say in the background “Tell him to ask his mother what she thinks.” “Shhh!” said Eliot. “It’s his decision.”

Many years later I was riding a trolley into the city and took an empty seat next to a well-dressed woman. She turned to me and said “You’re Robert Lanza, aren’t you? I worked in the Dean’s office and remember the day you had the fight with him. The office staff were all standing outside the door listening, and cheered when you told him off.”

Eliot Stellar died in 1993, my mentor, and one of the greatest physiological psychologists ever to live, and arguably the most decent human being I ever met.

I’ve often reflected upon Eliot Stellar’s place in the universe. This self-less man cared about everyone — his family, his students, and as Chair of the National Academy’s Human Rights Committee — the rest of the world. What greater act of transcendence is there than projecting your love and hope onto others? One can’t but come closer to God or Heaven than to merge oneself with the universal order of things. Eliot Stellar had become part of a greater reality. “The greatest good,” said Spinoza “is the knowledge of the union which the mind has with the whole nature.”

This isn’t idle philosophy. Science, too, is beginning to grasp the non-linear nature of reality. Heisenberg, the Nobel physicist whose uncertainty principle transformed our understanding of the world, once commented: “Contemporary science, today more than at any previous time, has been forced by nature herself to pose again the question of the possibility of comprehending reality by mental processes.” Alas! The evidence has the weight of a boulder. Shall our vision forever flow around it? Experiment (PhysRevLett 49, 91, 1982) after experiment (Nature 459, 683, 2009) continues to show that entangled particles act as if there’s no space or time separating them, a result that’s intelligible only if we assume the mind transcends the existence of things in space and time.

From this viewpoint, we’re not just the collection of cells and molecules classical science describes. Heinz Pagels, the esteemed theoretical physicist, once stated: “If you deny the objectivity of the world, unless you observe it and are conscious of it (as many prominent physicists have), then you end up with solipsism — the belief that your consciousness is the only one.” Although Pagels’ conclusion is right, it’s not just your consciousness that’s the only one, it’s ours. “Know in thyself and All one self-same soul,” says the old Hindu poem “banish the dream that sunders part from whole.”

According to biocentrism, the mind transcends space and time in that they’re its tools, and not the other way around. This conception of reality dissolves away human individuality. “Sometimes,” said Thoreau, “as I drift idly on Walden Pond, I cease to live and begin to be.” The walls of space and time are illusory. We’re all ephemeral forms of an individuality greater than ourselves, eternal even when we die. This is the indispensable prelude to immortality, and its highest form; we’re forced to recall the words of the English poet John Donne, “Never send to know for whom the bell tolls; it tolls for thee,” and to understand them in a more scientific way.

Years after graduating from medical school, I ran into the Dean in the hallway. He shook my hand and said, “As one human being to another” (referring to the day in his office). He congratulated me for my book “Medical Science and the Advancement of World Health,” which I dedicated to Eliot Stellar — who taught me that there’s more to life than the dance of atoms described in our science textbooks. I miss him.

Further Reading

Biocentrism
Biocentrism: How Life and Consciousness are the Keys to Understanding the True Nature of the Universe

Biocentrism takes you on a seemingly improbable but ultimately inescapable journey through a foreign universe‒our own‒from the viewpoints of an acclaimed biologist and a leading astronomer. It will shatter your ideas of life-time and space, and even death…you will never see reality the same again.

"Like "A Brief History of Time" it is indeed stimulating and brings biology into the whole. Any short statement does not do justice to such a scholarly work… Most importantly, it makes you think."
—Nobel Prize Winner E. Donnall Thomas

Beyond Biocentrism
Beyond Biocentrism: Rethinking Time, Space, Consciousness, and the Illusion of Death

"Beyond Biocentrism is an enlightening and fascinating journey that will forever alter your understanding of your own existence."
—Deepak Chopra

"Beyond Biocentrism is a joyride through the history of science and cutting-edge physics, all with a very serious purpose: to find the long-overlooked connection between the conscious self and the universe around us."
—Corey Powell, ex editor-in-chief, Discover magazine

"Will machines ever achieve consciousness? Are plants aware? Is death an illusion? These are some of the big questions tackled in Beyond Biocentrism, which serves up a new, biology-based theory of everything that is as delightful to read as it is fascinating."
—Pamela Weintraub, ex editor-in-chief of OMNI Magazine

The Grand Biocentric Design
The Grand Biocentric Design: How Life Creates Reality

What is consciousness? Why are we here? Where did it all come from? Humans have been asking these questions forever, but science hasn't succeeded in providing many answers – until now. In The Grand Biocentric Design, Robert Lanza, one of Time Magazine's "100 Most Influential People," is joined by theoretical physicist Matej Pavsic to shed light on the big picture that has long eluded philosophers and scientists alike.

"quite thrilling ... its notions are exciting ones, and they do a sound job of linking them to observable, replicable experiments. Fans of revolutionary science—or just big, cerebral questions—will enjoy this ambitious work. A thought-provoking dispatch from the frontier of physics."
—Kirkus Reviews

"a masterpiece"
—Anthony Atala, W. Boyce Professor, Wake Forest University

"paradigm-shattering"
—Lucian Del Priore, Robert R. Young Professor, Yale University

"It's fabulous—I couldn't put it down!"
—Ralph Levinson, Professor Emeritus, UCLA

"Robert Lanza is one of the most creative and brilliant scientists I have ever known"
—Kwang-Soo Kim, Professor, Harvard University

Scroll to Top